This is tenth of fifteen essays contained within the fourth issue of the Adult Analysis Anthology, a collection of longform writing that seeks to expand the breadth of critical discourse around adult games and adult game culture. If you’d like to support the creation of more high-quality writing about adult games the full anthology is available for purchase on Itch! Anthology logo by Pillow!
Written By: A. J. Malachite
In July 2025, itch.io mass delisted hundreds of adult games and other erotic media with no warning due to pressure from payment processor Stripe. There has been widespread outrage and concern over this censorship, with many organizing community action and support for the creators affected. Most of the anti-censorship backlash has focused, deservedly so, on how proponents of censorship define queer content as inherently pornographic – making a ban on “adult content” the first stop on a slippery slope to banning visible queer existence in media. A closer look at the policies of platforms like itch.io and Patreon reveals one of the key mechanisms in the slippery slope designed to harm and isolate queer people: vagueness that allows for open interpretation.
The itch.io content crackdown was just another action in a long line of governments, corporations, and platforms enforcing increasingly severe sexual repression. Only a few weeks prior, Steam had implemented their own crackdown, also in response to pressure from payment processors. In January 2022, the platform Game Jolt banned porn games in preparation for the launch of its mobile app. And in the past few years, over a third of U.S. states have introduced privacy-violating ID verification laws and other restrictions for online adult content, resulting in sites like PornHub blocking access to users in those states and a surge in the popularity of VPNs.


